Is s e cupp dating anyone
The decision nearly ripped the organization apart until a change in leadership was forced, the entire staff of ACU was turned over and a new policy prohibiting groups like GOProud from sponsorship was established. The court will hear back-to-back arguments next month in that case and another pivotal gay-rights case that challenges the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act. It’s a great opportunity for conservatives, young and old from all over the world, to get together and sort of touch base,” she told a welcome audience at MSNBC – hardly known for its conservative guests, audience or hosts. The new leadership of the ACU pledged to turn the page on this issue and did.They can't decide that a certain class of people can have the rights bestowed upon on them through marriage and others can't, so whether that's tax incentives, child-custody decisions, death benefits, hospital visitation, adoption—I mean, all of these issues.The government really privileges heterosexual marriage, and I think that's patently unfair.Many reporters and editors no doubt wish their work might change more minds, but many also recognize that it's not up to the press to pick presidential nominees.
It all began a few years ago when the American Conservative Union decided to allow GOProud to sponsor CPAC. This is not the Libertarian Political Action Conference. The document will be submitted this week to the Supreme Court in support of a suit seeking to strike down Proposition 8, a California ballot initiative barring same-sex marriage, and all similar bans. That's the vetting process, and Trump has indisputably been subjected to it.What's happening is a surprising number of voters are choosing to ignore, overlook or even embrace the qualities many journalists assumed would be damaging. The media provide information, and voters decide what to do with it. Believe me, believe me, I'm not thrilled with a — with a Trump nominee. This, I think, is how most of the press feels about Trump's success.Reporters have laid out who he is and what he stands for (or used to stand for) over and over again.